Home
Menu
P Sounds
Ms JD Pissing
Retro Mags
Victoria Super Pisser
Buy Victoria's Panties
Dear Readers,
my good luck came to an end last weekend, the weather suddenly turning bad. From 80 degree temps 2 weekends ago it was rain and temps in the mid 30's Friday night, and snow Saturday night. That kept me from going to Oktoberfest's 2nd weekend, although I went out later on Friday night and got 1 pee sighting. Saturday night's snow kept me home.
The one late Friday night pee sighting gives me 15 for September, along with 3 new shots, bettering my monthly averages with one more weekend left.
The weather is supposed to be seasonal (night temps in the 40's), so maybe I can break that September record of (only) 16 next weekend.
This week's lone pee sighting, and other news:
Friday was a steady drizzle of rain all day and night, which kept the ground wet and severely reduced my shooting possibilities. Wet, dark pavement muzzles camera flash unless I'm standing right next to a lady, as the ground becomes so dark the flash can't light anything on it from more than a couple of feet away. The crowd was noticeably smaller, falling rain definitely keeps people away much more than cold temperatures do. But I quickly noticed men were peeing everywhere (I saw close to 20 men), which usually means I'll see some ladies too, but I only saw one, even I understand why a lady wouldn't want to expose her butt to pee outside in this kind of weather:
Friday, 1:55 a.m.- I was walking by the big active parking lot (my favorite place this year), and walking through it saw a guy in his late 20's standing in front of a dumpster behind a building. He was facing the alley, he had to be covering someone. About 5 seconds later a tall slim blonde stands up behind him, where she had squatted by the side of the dumpster, and quickly pulls up her tight black pants. They walk to their car in the lot, about 30 feet away in the row by the alley. She had peed on some weeds growing there between a crack in the pavement, and this is why I hate the ground being wet so much - there is no 'evidence' left behind, no puddle to see!
Just before this happened another lady at a car in the lot left it and went back to the alley. She walked around looking at various places before coming back into the lot and going to her car, telling her waiting boyfriend, "I couldn't do it back there!"
Other tidbits:
I read about a controversy involving actress Farah Fawcett last week. An angry Farah told the New York Daily News that she is outraged at author Joe Eszterhas, for what he wrote about her in his new book, titled American Rhapsody. "I'd like to slap him!" she said.
What did he write? Eszterhas, a former writer for Rolling Stone magazine, wrote that while at a swanky Hollywood party, "Farah relieved herself on the front lawn." Said an angry Farah: "I'm so upset! I'm shy. I mean, I can go on a trip for days and not go because I won't sit on a toilet seat on a plane. I'm certainly not going to go on somebody's lawn. Could you imagine, in a cocktail dress?"
Yes Farah, I certainly could! Of course I had to check out this controversy for myself, so I went to a bookstore here and found the book and looked through it. There it was, on page 45: "At a Hollywood party Farah, finding the bathrooms full, went out on the lawn and pooped"...
Pooped? You mean she didn't pee, she took a shit in the yard? Well, that IS a little hard to believe! But I'll say if it's true, she probably peed too.
Who ever takes a shit without peeing?
The book is pretty much like listening to conversation you'd hear men saying in a locker room or while drinking beers in a bar. Eszterhas has a fascination with the movers and shakers in both Hollywood and Washington D.C., and their sexual behavior. There's a lot of stuff about President Clinton and the Lewinsky scandal, Senator Bob Packwood and his trysts with female aides, and the sexual fetishes of Vernon Jordan and other powerful D.C. people and prominent Hollywood people. If such things interest you, you'd enjoy the book.
Interesting:
Remember the 4 newest shots I reviewed a few weeks ago? I said they were printed light and were washed-out looking, but streams were visible in 2 of the 4 shots. Well, I got my extra prints of them back from my custom lab Saturday and as I expected, the shots were printed darker and look much better - more like what I actually saw when I snapped the ladies. The distant shot of the pretty Hispanic lady squatted by the dumpster who enjoyed me snapping her looks much better, I can enjoy her pretty face and big smile now. But amazingly, the visible streams in the 2 shots where they showed are harder to see in the correctly printed shots! That surprises me, I guess underexposing shots - at the expense of not bringing out detail in the rest of the shot - is the way to best expose a stream of pee flowing from a lady. Is a lady's stream more important than the rest of the shot, in these instances, or is a more pleasing overall shot where the stream might not show more important? Tough question, but I like the better overall shots the most because a lot of the appeal to me is the details of the lady and where she's peeing - the biggest difference between my work and the typical pee-porn out there on this subject!